Letter to the First Presidency: The Purpose of Sex
Late last summer I had an extremely concerning experience with my Stake President. More can be read about that, here. In response, and in an effort to seek a resolution, I recently wrote the following letter to the First Presidency.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
February 18, 2016
Office of the First Presidency
47 East South Temple Street
Salt Lake City, Utah 84150
Dear Brethren:
I’m so sad that I even need to write a letter to express
concerns regarding my Stake President. The things I am going to share are very
personal and I very much wish to have this experience resolved already.
However, the experience I am about to recount was entirely too painful to make
an appointment to meet with him; risking it happening all over again, and he
has not made any effort to reach out to me, either. I do want you to know, that
although this experience was painful, I do have a sure testimony of the Gospel
of Jesus Christ. I know that His plan of redemption has been fully restored to
this earth through the Prophet Joseph Smith. Furthermore, I freely and fully
sustain the power and authority of the Priesthood on this earth, as well as the
keys that are held on my behalf. And, gratefully, I have never had any
conflicts with any of my previous Priesthood leaders.
My husband and I make it a habit to nurture a good working
relationship with our Priesthood leaders because for most of our lives we have
both struggled with sexual addiction. Gratefully, almost seven years ago we
both found recovery through the Church’s Addiction Recovery Program and since
then—through incorporating many other recovery programs, practices and tools—we
are now doing really well. Part of working our ‘program of recovery’ includes
meeting with our Bishop regularly, and sometimes even our Stake President, for
it has helped us maintain our sense of self-worth, feeling the love of the
Savior, and has given us hope in our ability to complete and maintain spiritual
goals. However, as well as we were doing in our individual personal recovery,
we were having some difficulties in our marriage. So, around six months ago, we
met with our Stake President as
we already had been for quite some time. During this particular meeting, my
husband and I met separately with him, me going first.
Our conversation started off well enough. I’d already
established what I felt to be a good working relationship with him; trusting
him enough to share some recent struggles that I’d had, both personally and
with my husband. Toward the end of my recount of the recent events, he asked me
how my husband was doing. I replied honestly, saying I felt he had been
somewhat distant. It was after this question, and my subsequent answer, that I
felt the energy in the room shift.
He then asked me how our marital sexual intimacy had been
fairing. I was taken aback by the question, but because I’d previously had
positive interactions with him, I answered honestly. I shared that considering
the struggle I have with my own sexual addiction to pornography and
masturbation, and striving to heal from the sexual abuse I have suffered at the
hand of my husband, things weren't exactly great. I wasn't ready to be that physically
vulnerable yet because I didn’t feel safe with him or trust him, so my husband
and I had mutually agreed to slow things down sexually in an effort to focus on
our emotional and spiritual connection. So things were progressing, even if
slowly.
We sat a moment in silence, and then he looked me right in
the eye and told me it is my responsibility to have sex with my husband. He
told me that if I didn't, my husband would eventually stray, because men need
sex. Stunned, I asked; "So you're saying it's my job to service my
husband?" He hummed and hawed about my choice of terminology, but in the
end, confirmed that yes, it's my job to provide sexual relief. I sat there in
silence, my usual witty responses in just as much shock as I was.
The conversation continued…
Stake President: ‘It even says it in the church handbook.’
Me, not believing him: ‘Where? I want to see it.’
Stake President: ‘Well, it says something like that, that
one of the purposes of sex is to bring couples closer together.’
Me: ‘I know that one of the purposes of sex is to bring
couples closer together, but don't you think after all that I have shared with
you that there may be extenuating circumstances in my marriage?’
Stake President: ‘Well, the brethren also mention it in conference
talks.’
Me: ‘Really? Who? I want to see that, too.’
Stake President: ‘Well, they don't just come out and say
it. You have to read between the lines.’
By this time, a war had begun to rage within me. I felt torn
because I have always trusted my Priesthood leaders; believing that they hold
keys to guide me, but at the same time, everything in me resisted what he was
saying. All of my recovery work, all of my learned ability to rely on the Lord
and all of His personal revelation has led me to a very different understanding
of my role as His beloved daughter. My belief is that it is not my
responsibility, obligation, or purpose to sexually ‘satisfy’ my husband. And to
have that distortion presented as truth to me by my Stake President felt really
wrong. Not only that, but it deeply hurt me. I felt that he was not able to see
my worth as I see my worth, as my Savior sees my worth. It is also my
understanding that dictating the frequency of sexual contact between married
couples does not fall under the stewardship or purview of Priesthood leadership.
Gratefully, through the sweet prompting of the Spirit, the
right words were given to me in response to him in a clear and
direct, yet respectful, way; "I'm sorry, but I don't agree. I don't feel
God placed us here on this earth to be slave to our sexual drive, but to rely
on our Savior in order to rise above it, and master it." He didn't seem to
hear me though, and I was so hurt and offended by that point that I couldn’t
really recover in that moment anyway, so I picked up my bag, rose, said I
couldn't listen anymore, and left.
By the time I reached the outside doors to the building I
had started to cry. By the time I reached the edge of the parking lot, I was
overcome by racking sobs.
I couldn't believe it. I couldn't believe that my Stake
President, the man that I'd already established so much trust in, this man of
God that holds keys for me and is supposed to receive revelation for me, would actually
say those things.
Due to the depths of my sexual addiction, I have spent most
of my life feeling like a piece of meat, ripe for the taking. Since starting
recovery from my addiction, I have fought these feelings, truly striving to see
myself as the beautiful daughter of God that I am; divinely worthy, and
valuable far beyond the function of my body. And then, somehow, my Stake
President managed to strip me of all that work in a matter of moments.
Listening to his words took me back to the time when my feelings of self-worth
were so low that I thought prostituting myself was all I was good for.
Gratefully, that flashback was but for a moment, because deep down I know that
what he said isn’t true. My value does extend farther than the function of my
body. This I know, because my Savior has born witness of it.
I also can’t help but think about others that his comments
may affect. Not because of what he said directly to me, but because of the
possibility his core belief has influenced them. At one point he also said to
me that he has met with many men who struggle with sexual addiction, and many
of them say the same thing; that they aren’t getting enough sex at home. Although
sexual intimacy has a beautiful God-given purpose, those bound in sexual
addiction are dictated by lust and carnal craving. There is nothing intimate,
connective or loving about it. And here is their Stake President, justifying
and rationalizing their lust addiction for them. And their poor wives, many of
whom may leave his office actually believing that it’s their job to satiate
their husbands sexual ‘needs.’ I just feel so incredibly sad for them; the men
and the women both, for the toxicity of lust extends far beyond the reach of
its host.
I’ve spent the last six months trying to ‘get over’ what my
Stake President said to me. I did get to a point where I felt as though I’d
moved passed it, until I attended Stake Conference a couple of weeks ago. It
was there, faced with the conflict of sustaining my Stake President, that I
knew I had to do something more to be free of the hurt and anger I still
harbor. So I met with my Bishop. From him I learned that concerns with Stake
Presidents are handled through The Office of the First Presidency. So here I
am. Sharing my experience.
Thank you so much for taking the time to read this very
long-winded letter, and I am genuinely grateful for your personal attention to
this very painful experience.
Sincerely,
Sidreis Agla
It took about a month and a half, but this past Sunday I received a call from my bishop informing me that my Area President wanted to meet with me.
That experience can be found, here.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
It took about a month and a half, but this past Sunday I received a call from my bishop informing me that my Area President wanted to meet with me.
That experience can be found, here.
Good on you for standing up. Your Stake President sounds like a mysogynistic jerk. But what's sad is this isn't an one off occurrence. Women (particularly young women) are subject to personal worthiness interviews where an untrained man asks deeply personal questions about sexuality. It leads to shame, guilt, and a lack of openness that harms the church. I'll never let my daughter get interviewed without myself or wife present. I am glad you're optimistic about this, but I wouldn't be surprised if Elder Jensen took the Stake President's side.
ReplyDeleteThis week my PTW group met with our bishops. (mine didn't come) and one of them asked about where our addictions come from and I sensed that same issue, that men were driven by lust, but women by loneliness and I shared that women are sexual beings too. We aren't here to service men! Sheesh!
ReplyDeleteGreat job speaking up Sidreis!!!!!!!!! 👍👍💖👏
ReplyDeleteBeautiful letter Sidreis. I can't imagine the feelings you've gone through. So happy you've not let this destroy your faith. I admire your integrity.
ReplyDeleteI am so grateful to know Warriors like you. Your bravery will bless so many women in the Church. I hate to say that we need to fight for rights as Latter-day Saint women, maybe what we need are defenders of the truth. We need to be teachers. We need to call one another to repentance when the truths are not being taught. More so when what is taught from behind the desk of a called, set-apart, key holding leader is dead wrong. Yes, we live in an oversexualized world, but those ideas do not, should not, can not, permeate our attitudes, conversations and counsel to members. You are amazing. I am grateful for your bravery!
ReplyDeleteI wrote here previously when you shared about this. I'm greatful you contacted the first presidency. I look forward to your responce with the Area President
ReplyDeleteThis is why I don't do organized religion. It's a man's world where woman are to be used. To me - there is absolutely nothing in the Mormon religion that's woman oriented. It's all about the men. Get out. Get out now and start living your life. Forget about letting a man decide what's best for you and your marriage. He is no counselor. He is not educated in these things. Go and see a real counselor.
ReplyDelete